BioPharmaPT
โ† All reports

Teva B V โ€” Trisenox EMA EPAR variation assessment report (EMEA/H/C/000388, 2002)

Teva B V ยท 2002 ยท EMA EPAR variation assessment report ยท company profile โ†’

Report summary

This report summarizes a Type II variation application for Trisenox (arsenic trioxide) to expand its indication for newly diagnosed low-to-intermediate risk acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). The application is based on the APL0406 study, a Phase 3 non-inferiority trial comparing ATRA+ATO to standard ATRA and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Efficacy data from APL0406 and AML17 show high complete remission rates and improved event-free and overall survival with ATRA+ATO, especially in low-to-intermediate-risk APL. While ATRA+ATO demonstrated a more favorable safety profile regarding myelosuppression, it was associated with higher rates of QTc prolongation and hepatotoxicity compared to ATRA+chemotherapy. The report also references various scientific publications and clinical trials supporting the use of ATO and ATRA combinations in APL.

Key findings โ€” cited to the page

Alopecia (Grade 3)3 %AML17 ยท p.44
Oral (Grade 3)1 %AML17 ยท p.44
Nausea (Grade 3)0 %AML17 ยท p.44
Nausea (Grade 3)4 %AML17 ยท p.44
Diarrhoea (Grade 3)1 %AML17 ยท p.44
Diarrhoea (Grade 3)6 %AML17 ยท p.44
Neurotoxicity (Grade 3-4) at 1st consolidation cycle4 %APL0406 ยท p.43
Gastrointestinal toxicity (Grade 3-4) at Induction2 %APL0406 ยท p.43
Neurotoxicity (Grade 3-4) at 3rd consolidation cycle6 %APL0406 ยท p.43
Neurotoxicity (Grade 3-4) at 2nd consolidation cycle5 %APL0406 ยท p.43
Alopecia (Grade 3)13 %AML17 ยท p.44
Oral (Grade 3)15 %AML17 ยท p.44

Source: Teva B V โ†— ยท License: EMA - reuse permitted with acknowledgement. Summary and findings are extracted from the published document; every figure cites its page. Informational only โ€” not investment advice. Explore the Oncology library โ†’

Teva B V โ€” Trisenox EMA EPAR variation assessment report (EMEA/H/C/000388, 2002) โ€” Summary & Key Findings | BioPharmaPT