BioPharmaPT
โ† All reports

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company โ€” Yervoy EMA EPAR variation assessment report (EMEA/H/C/002213, 2011)

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ยท 2011 ยท EMA EPAR variation assessment report ยท company profile โ†’

Report summary

This report details Bristol-Myers Squibb's Type II variation application for Yervoy (ipilimumab) and Opdivo (nivolumab) to extend their first-line indication for unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The application is supported by the Phase 3 CA2099DW study, which compared the combination therapy to sorafenib or lenvatinib. The study demonstrated statistically significant improvements in overall survival and objective response rate for the combination, despite a higher incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events. The report includes detailed pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, and exposure-response analyses for nivolumab and ipilimumab, along with the study's design and statistical analysis plan. The benefit-risk balance was deemed positive, leading to a recommendation for approval.

Key findings โ€” cited to the page

Grade 3-4 AEs (all causality)62.5 % ยท p.146
Grade 3-4 hepatitis15.4 % ยท p.144
Grade 3-4 AEs (nivo+ipi)69.3 % ยท p.144
Grade 3-4 AEs (all causality)69.3 % ยท p.146
Grade 3-4 AEs (drug-related)42.5 % ยท p.146
Grade 3-4 AEs (drug-related)41.3 % ยท p.146
Any grade AE (nivo+ipi)99.7 % ยท p.144
Any grade AE (SOC)98.5 % ยท p.144
Grade 3-4 AEs (SOC)62.5 % ยท p.144
OS improvement3 months ยท p.147
AEs leading to discontinuation (all causality)23.1 % ยท p.146
OESIs Pancreatitis0.3 % ยท p.146

Source: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company โ†— ยท License: EMA - reuse permitted with acknowledgement. Summary and findings are extracted from the published document; every figure cites its page. Informational only โ€” not investment advice. Explore the Oncology library โ†’

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company โ€” Yervoy EMA EPAR variation assessment report (EMEA/H/C/002213, 2011) โ€” Summary & Key Findings | BioPharmaPT