Lynparza vs Zejula
both PARP inhibitors reviewed for ovarian cancer
Lynparza(olaparib)
AstraZeneca PLC ยท 1983 cited findings โ
Zejula(niraparib)
GSK plc ยท 204 cited findings โ
What the regulatory reviews say
Lynparza (olaparib) and Zejula (niraparib) are both PARP inhibitors reviewed for ovarian cancer. Lynparza's indications include monotherapy for adult patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer who have been treated with three or more prior lines of chemotherapy, and maintenance treatment for adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Zejula is indicated as monotherapy for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in response to platinum-based chemotherapy.
For Lynparza, in the ITT population, the Hazard Ratio for rPFS was 0.66, with a Median rPFS of 25 months in the olaparib arm and 17 months in the placebo arm. For Zejula, the Tumour regression rate in orthotopic high-grade serous ovarian cancer PDX models (HRD positive models) was 44%.
These drugs were studied in separate trials with different designs, populations, and timepoints. The reported figures are from each drug's own review documents and are not head-to-head comparisons. Neither drug is presented as superior to the other.
Each drug's own results โ cited
| Lynparza | Zejula | |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Grade โฅ 3 adverse reactions / Dose modifications due to AEs | 56 % (olaparib + abiraterone) AstraZeneca PLC โ Lynparza FDA Review (NDA/BLA 208558, 2025), p.87 | >70 % due to AEs GSK plc โ Zejula EMA EPAR public assessment report, p.120 |
Explore the full evidence
Every cited finding behind both drugs is in the Oncology research library โ
Figures are as stated in the cited regulatory review documents. Educational reference only โ not medical or investment advice.