BioPharmaPT
โ† All metabolic drugs

Type 1 diabetes

Metabolicยท 10 reviewed drugsยท 8629 cited findings behind them

What the regulatory reviews cover

The regulatory review documents in this library for Type 1 diabetes include Tresiba, Ryzodeg, Tzield, Lyumjev, Awiqli, Teizeild, Fiasp, LANTUS, Apidra, and Humalog Mix 50/50. These drugs are indicated for various aspects of diabetes mellitus treatment, including improving glycemic control, delaying the decline in endogenous insulin production, and delaying the onset of Stage 3 T1D.

Different drugs were studied in different trials, so the figures are not head-to-head comparisons. For instance, Tresiba showed an HbA1c change from baseline of -0.57. Ryzodeg demonstrated a Day-to-day variability in glucose-lowering effect (AUCGIR,ฯ„,SS) (CV%) of 20, compared to 82 for comparator IGlar. Tzield reported a Difference in LSMean change from baseline in C-peptide AUC (log transformed) of 0.13. Teizeild showed a Median time to progression to stage 3 T1D of 49.5 months, versus 24.9 months for placebo.

The drugs โ€” one cited result each

Tresiba

NOVO

HbA1c change from baseline: -0.57

NOVO โ€” Tresiba FDA Review (NDA/BLA 203314, 2018), p.31

Ryzodeg

Novo Nordisk A S

Day-to-day variability in glucose-lowering effect (AUCGIR,ฯ„,SS) (CV%): 20

Novo Nordisk A S โ€” Ryzodeg EMA EPAR public assessment report, p.37

Tzield

PROVENTION BIO INC

Difference in LSMean change from baseline in C-peptide AUC (log transformed): 0.13

PROVENTION BIO INC โ€” Tzield FDA Review (BLA761183, SUPPL 10,, p.69

Lyumjev

Eli Lilly and Company

Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (<3.0 mmol/L) rate (LY900014): 6.71

Eli Lilly and Company โ€” Lyumjev (previously Liumjev) EMA EPA, p.168

Awiqli

Novo Nordisk A S

Serious AEs (ONWARDS 2, insulin icodec): 8.4

Novo Nordisk A S โ€” Awiqli EMA EPAR public assessment report, p.137

Teizeild

Sanofi

Median time to progression to stage 3 T1D (Teizeild): 49.5

Sanofi โ€” Teizeild EMA EPAR public assessment report (EMEA/H/, p.9

Fiasp

NOVO

HbA1c treatment difference (meal-time Fiasp vs meal-time NovoLog): -0.17

NOVO โ€” Fiasp FDA Review (NDA/BLA 208751, 2026), p.9

LANTUS

Sanofi

HbA1c adjusted mean change from baseline (Study A): +0.21

Lantus FDA Review, p.19

Apidra

Sanofi

HbA1c change from baseline: -0.1

SANOFI AVENTIS US โ€” Apidra FDA Review (NDA/BLA 021629, 2020), p.38

Humalog Mix 50/50

Eli Lilly and Company

Fasting Blood Glucose (Type 1 diabetes): 209.5 ยฑ 91.6

LILLY โ€” Humalog Mix 50/50 FDA Review (NDA/BLA 021018, 2020), p.20

Different drugs were studied in different trials โ€” these figures are not head-to-head comparisons.

Explore the full evidence

Every finding behind these drugs โ€” searchable, comparable and answerable in plain language โ€” is in the Metabolic research library โ†’

Lists reflect the regulatory review documents in this library, not all therapies that exist. Educational reference only โ€” not medical or investment advice.

Type 1 diabetes โ€” 10 Drugs, FDA & EMA Review Findings | BioPharmaPT Metabolic